Scuttlebutt

Scuttlebutt

A $650M prediction-markets bet pays back in 4 years either way — DraftKings CEO

4 calls: why the spending shock isn't the whole story, the four-year payback even if the Supreme Court bans the bet, and why midterms traffic wasn't real volume

Scuttlebutt's avatar
Scuttlebutt
Nov 07, 2026
∙ Paid

Bloomberg Talks · Nov 6, 2026

With Jason Robins, Co-Founder & CEO of DraftKings

A $650M prediction-markets bet pays back in 4 years either way — DraftKings CEO

DraftKings shares fell 26% to 29% after the company cut its 2027 earnings forecast and missed third-quarter estimates. Jason Robins, co-founder and CEO of DraftKings, told Bloomberg Talks host Tim Stenovec that the drop looks worse than the math behind it. Most of the $650 million to $700 million DraftKings spent on prediction markets this year was marketing, and this year's new customers are projected to generate $350 million of gross profit next year.

"We still will be able to pay back these cohorts in roughly four years." — Jason Robins

As DraftKings' co-founder, Jason set the prediction-markets strategy himself, and he is now the one defending the spending against a Supreme Court case that could ban sports-related prediction contracts outright.

The full segment is covered here so you can skip it.

Here are the 4 calls that matter.


This Scuttlebutt Summary is available in full to premium subscribers. If you're not one already, please consider subscribing to keep reading.


Key Takeaways

  • Most of the $650 million to $700 million DraftKings spent on prediction markets went to marketing, not product

    • The figure ran well above DraftKings' original guidance of $200M–$300M

  • This year's acquired customers are projected to generate $350 million of gross profit next year

  • Even a Supreme Court loss leaves this year's cohorts paid back in about four years

    • Jason said rivals built only on prediction markets have no other business to fall back on

  • Midterm betting drew traffic, not trading volume

    • Only markets with real liquidity reflected genuine sentiment, Jason said

1. A $650M Marketing Bill

DraftKings had guided investors to expect $200 million to $300 million in prediction-markets spending this year. The actual bill came in well above that, which is what triggered the sell-off.

Most of the $650 million to $700 million went to marketing, not product

"Most of that was marketing investment to acquire customers." — Jason Robins

That spending bought customers the company expects to keep. The size of the number still caught investors off guard.

The spending figure gave investors sticker shock

"There was some sticker shock." — Jason Robins

Jason said the reaction echoes 2022 and 2023, when DraftKings absorbed heavy customer-acquisition losses in sports betting that later turned profitable.

2. $350M Payback Next Year

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Scuttlebutt.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 The Golden Age LLC · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for writing, podcasting, and media founders.