Scuttlebutt

Scuttlebutt

An investor who ignored politics ended with $26 million, Signal or Noise finds

8 takeaways: why new highs aren't a sell signal, why rising rates haven't hurt stocks, why Nike and Lululemon prove "buy what you know" fails, and why 98% of pros lose to the index

Scuttlebutt's avatar
Scuttlebutt
Oct 23, 2026
∙ Paid

Signal or Noise · Oct 22, 2026 · 31m · 22m saved

With Peter Mallouk, CEO, Creative Planning

An investor who ignored politics ended with $26 million, Signal or Noise finds

Photo via creativeplanning.com

The S&P 500 has posted 1,334 all-time highs since it started in 1957, and the pace has sped up from about one every 19 days historically to about one every eight days in recent years. Most investors see a new high and assume it's time to sell; Peter Mallouk, president and CEO of Creative Planning, told co-host Charlie Bilello on the firm's Signal or Noise show that the instinct has it backwards.

"The market's expected return rolling forward one, three, and five years is actually higher following an all-time high than all other time periods." — Peter Mallouk

Peter runs a firm that manages or advises on more than $780 billion in combined assets, and together with Charlie, Creative Planning's chief market strategist, he's spent 80 episodes testing which market beliefs hold up and which don't.

The full episode is covered here so you can skip it. 31 minutes of audio, 9 minutes of reading.

Here are the 8 takeaways that matter.


This Scuttlebutt Summary is available in full to premium subscribers. If you're not one already, please consider subscribing to keep reading.


Key Takeaways

  • Expected returns are higher after an all-time high, not lower

    • The S&P has posted 1,334 highs since 1957, now about one every 8 days

  • Stocks and GDP are barely correlated

    • Only about 5% of a year's S&P return traces to GDP; 2020 and 2022 prove it

  • Stocks have risen even as the 10-year yield climbs

    • S&P returns have been higher, on average, when the 10-year yield is rising

  • Nike and Lululemon cratered while the index they're part of soared

    • Both fell over 70% in five years while the S&P rose over 80%

  • 98% of professional stock-pickers lag their benchmark over 20 years

  • A long Treasury bet took on 23% volatility for little reward

    • A 25-plus-year zero-coupon ETF carried big risk without a big payoff

  • Ignoring politics beat picking a side by millions

    • $26 million versus $380,000 (Republican-only) and $693,000 (Democrat-only)

1. Highs Aren't a Sell Signal

Charlie opened with the pace of record highs; Peter's explanation for why that shouldn't scare anyone starts with ordinary pricing, not forecasting.

Expected returns are higher after a record, not lower

"The market's expected return rolling forward one, three, and five years is actually higher following an all-time high than all other time periods." — Peter Mallouk

Records tend to be followed by more records rather than an imminent top, he said, because prices for nearly everything — a Disney World ticket, a Hershey bar, a hotel room — are expected to rise over a decade, and stocks are no different once dividends, earnings growth and inflation are added in.

People trust that prices rise, except at the stock market

"If I were to ask anybody, do you think a ticket to Disney World's gonna cost more in 10 years? Of course... And I say the stock market, well, I don't know." — Peter Mallouk

The inconsistency is the whole myth, Peter argued: nobody questions that ordinary prices climb over a decade, but that same certainty evaporates the moment the asset in question is a stock index.

2. The Market Isn't the Economy

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Scuttlebutt.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 The Golden Age LLC · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture