Scuttlebutt

Scuttlebutt

CNBC's Investment Committee: the S&P's 2.3% Q3 gain is misleading

5 arguments: why tech capex is intact despite the political blowback, the Barclays stat behind a "misleading" 2.3% Q3 gain, and the AI financing wall ahead

Scuttlebutt's avatar
Scuttlebutt
Oct 13, 2026
∙ Paid

Halftime Report (CNBC) · Oct 12, 2026 · 10m

With Jenny Harrington, CEO, Gilman Hill Asset Management · Jim Lebenthal, CIO, Lebenthal Asset Management · Steve Weiss, Founder & CIO, Short Hills Capital Partners

CNBC's Investment Committee: the S&P's 2.3% Q3 gain is misleading

Photo via Pan Macmillan

The S&P 500's third-quarter total return came in at 2.3% — and Jenny Harrington, CEO of Gilman Hill Asset Management, told CNBC's Investment Committee that number is badly misleading.

A Barclays statistic the host cited put more than half of S&P 500 members down at least 20% from their highs, among the weakest market-breadth divergence on record going back to the 1990s. Most coverage of Q3 earnings season frames the index as near record highs; Jenny and fellow panelists Jim Lebenthal and Steve Weiss spent the segment arguing about what's actually hiding underneath that number.

"You're up 2.3%. And holy moly, was that misleading." — Jenny Harrington

Jenny has run Gilman Hill's income-focused portfolio since 2009; Jim Lebenthal and Steve Weiss round out the panel, each having managed money through every earnings season this cycle has thrown at them.

The full segment is covered here so you can skip it.

Here are the 5 arguments that matter.


This Scuttlebutt Summary is available in full to premium subscribers. If you're not one already, please consider subscribing to keep reading.


Key Takeaways

  • Jenny Harrington doesn't expect Q3 EPS to disappoint — the real risk, she says, sits in guidance and the pace of earnings growth

    • Consensus expects S&P earnings up another 15% in 2027, and she's unsure that holds

  • Jim Lebenthal says hyperscaler capex plans remain intact, "maybe even" higher, despite political blowback over data centers

  • Steve Weiss calls "market" a misleading word when most individual stocks trade below their 50-day and 200-day averages

  • The S&P's headline 2.3% Q3 total return is "misleading," Jenny says, pointing to a Barclays stat that more than half of index members are down at least 20% from their highs

  • Weiss compares AI compute demand to Ferrari demand — plenty of people want one, but financing, not demand, is the real constraint ahead

1. Is the Bar Too High?

The host opens with a market check — the Dow up about 0.4%, the S&P roughly flat, the Nasdaq down about 0.2% — and asks the panel whether expectations for Q3 earnings are too elevated heading into the reporting season.

The risk isn't the headline number, it's the guidance

"Where the rubber will hit the road will be in what the guidance is, and what the forecasts are, and what the pace of earnings growth is going to be." — Jenny Harrington

Jenny says she doesn't expect the actual earnings prints to disappoint, but she's been waiting two months to see how the trajectory of earnings growth holds up.

"I've been waiting in no man's land for about two months now to see what these numbers are." — Jenny Harrington

She also flags a pattern she expects to repeat: Nvidia delivering blowout numbers only to see its stock react tepidly afterward.

"The behavior will be more telling than the actual data." — Jenny Harrington

2. Tech Capex Holds Steady

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Scuttlebutt.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 The Golden Age LLC · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture