Scuttlebutt

Scuttlebutt

"The AI attack is here": Project Eleven's CTO on the threat to crypto's cryptography

11 takeaways: how AI broke 2 test schemes in 2 months, why Project Eleven's CEO now puts Q-Day at 2033 to 2035, and why hash-based keys answer both threats at once

Scuttlebutt's avatar
Scuttlebutt
Oct 22, 2026
∙ Paid

Unchained · Oct 20, 2026 · 1h 2m · 51m saved

With Alex Pruden, Co-Founder and CEO of Project Eleven · Conor Deegan, CTO of Project Eleven

"The AI attack is here": Project Eleven's CTO on the threat to crypto's cryptography

In the past two months, AI attacks have broken two post-quantum cryptographic schemes, one of them for about $100,000. Alex Pruden, co-founder and CEO of Project Eleven, and Conor Deegan, its CTO, told Laura Shin on Unchained that AI has become a second threat to crypto's cryptography, alongside quantum computing.

For years the industry has treated quantum computing as the threat to the math that secures wallets. Conor's point is that a quantum computer is still being built, while the AI systems probing the same math already exist.

"We know that elliptic curves will break. They will definitely break to quantum computing. It's just a matter of what date. AI is the reverse — we already have the machine that is attacking these curves. We just don't know if it will break them." — Conor Deegan

Alex and Conor build post-quantum security for crypto, and Project Eleven has just launched a custody platform designed to switch between cryptographic schemes as old ones fail.

The full episode is covered here so you can skip it. 1 hour 2 minutes of audio, 11 minutes of reading.

Here are the 11 takeaways that matter.


This Scuttlebutt Summary is available in full to premium subscribers. If you're not one already, please consider subscribing to keep reading.


Key Takeaways

  • AI may threaten elliptic-curve cryptography before quantum computers do

    • No scheme used in production today is broken

  • AI attacks have already broken 2 post-quantum schemes that were not in production

    • One fell for about $100,000, according to Conor

  • Hash functions have been retired more often than elliptic curves, even though hashes look safer against AI

  • Alex's Q-Day forecast is 2030 at the earliest, more likely than not by 2033 to 2035

  • Moving to hash-based signatures solves the quantum and the AI problem together

  • Doing nothing is the real risk, in Alex's view, and chains that start migrating will win

  • Getting the migration started is 80% of the work, according to Conor

1. AI May Break Curves First

The episode started from Ethereum researcher Justin Drake's call for crypto to prepare a "bunker mode": a controlled move of assets to addresses whose public keys stay hidden behind a hash. His worry is that AI, and not only quantum computers, may soon be good enough at math to break the elliptic-curve cryptography that blockchains rely on.

Alex said the post reflects two things at once: real progress in quantum computing, and frontier AI labs, OpenAI among them, publishing large batches of new math results. None of those results is about cryptography, but they have unsettled cryptographers, including Johns Hopkins' Matthew Green, who warned of a "small chance" the field could lose public-key cryptography in general.

Conor Deegan says the machine that might break elliptic curves already exists

"We know that elliptic curves will break. They will definitely break to quantum computing. It's just a matter of what date. AI is the reverse — we already have the machine that is attacking these curves. We just don't know if it will break them." — Conor Deegan

Quantum is a question of when the hardware arrives. AI is a question of whether existing systems find a way in, and nobody can yet say.

2. How the Trapdoor Works

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Scuttlebutt.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 The Golden Age LLC · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture